机动车交通事故责任纠纷案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例

一、耿红傲诉王有松等机动车交通事故责任纠纷再审案

【裁判要旨】

雇佣的驾驶员驾驶已经由车主投保了交强险和商业第三者险的机动车发生交通事故造成非机动车人员伤亡的，对事故造成的人员伤亡和财产损失首先由交强险责任限额内予以赔偿，不足部分按照事故过错的比例承担责任。机动车车主在雇员的过错比例范围内通过商业第三者责任险进行了赔付，并不对其他的过错责任者的赔偿承担连带责任。

[Judgment Abstract] 

Where a traffic accident occurs and causes casualties of non-motor vehicles when an employed driver drives a motor vehicle that has been insured by the owner with compulsory traffic insurance and third-party commercial insurance, the human casualties and property losses incurred therefrom should be first compensated within the liability limit of compulsory traffic insurance, and the burden of covering the shortfall should be based on the fault ratio among parties involved in the accident. The owner of the motor vehicle should not assume the joint and several liability for the fault of other parties if he has paid compensation through the third-party commercial liability insurance within the ratio of the employed driver's fault.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.9355955

二、史文杰诉吴汉军等机动车交通事故责任纠纷案

Shi Wenjie v. Wu Hanjun, et al. (case regarding dispute over a motor vehicle traffic accident)

【裁判摘要】

在向他人出借车辆时，机动车所有人应尽到必要的审查义务，即对借用人是否具有相应的行为能力、驾驶能力，机动车是否处于适于运行状态等影响机动车安全驾驶的因素进行合理审查。未经机动车所有人同意，具有驾照的完全行为能力人擅自改变借用车辆用途而造成他人损害的，超出了机动车所有人审查义务的范围，机动车所有人对此不承担赔偿责任，而应由借用人自行承担赔偿责任。

[Judgment Abstract]

A vehicle owner should, prior to lending his vehicle to another person, perform the duty of reasonable examination on the influential factors of safe driving, including the borrower's capacity for civil conduct, his capability of driving, and vehicle condition - whether it is in a good shape for driving. In the circumstances where a person with full capacity for civil conduct who possesses a driving license causes a damage to others as a result of making alterations to the use of the borrowed vehicle without the owner's permission, such acts fall outside the scope of the owner's duty of examination. Therefore, the vehicle owner assumes no liability, whereas the borrower should be liable for damages.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.6428203

[CLI Code] CLI.C. 6428203 (EN)

三、陈思雨与徐浩然等机动车交通事故责任纠纷上诉案

Chen Siyu v. Xu Haoran, et al. (appeal case regarding dispute over liability for a motor vehicle traffic accident)

【裁判要旨】

机动车交通事故责任纠纷中，受害人无固定收入的，且不能举证近三年收入的，误工费可以参照相同或者相近行业上一年度职工的平均工资计算。实践中，受害人作为家庭主妇向肇事方主张获得误工费赔偿时，因其没有稳定的职业及稳定收入，亦无法提供误工收入证明，法院可以参照居民服务、维修和其他服务业上一年度职工的平均工资计算误工费的具体数额。

[Judgment Abstract]

In a dispute over liability for a motor vehicle traffic accident, the victim who neither has a source of fixed income nor can testify his/her total income for the latest three years, is entitled to an indemnity against the charge for his/her loss of working time in light of the average salary of an employee in the same or similar sector for the past one year. In practice, if the victim, as a housewife who neither has a stable job or income, nor can supply a proof of her income for her loss of working time, files a claim against the perpetrator for her loss of income due to the missed working time, the people's court should determine the amount of the victim's income loss by referring to the average salary of an employee in neighborhood services, maintenance services or other service sectors for the past one year.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.95272527

[CLI Code] CLI.C. 95272527 (EN)